Epidural Volume Extension with Saline in Combined Spinal–Epidural Anesthesia for Hip Surgeries Using Low Dose of Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine

Background and Aims The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of epidural volume extension (EVE) technique in terms of sensory and motor block characteristics along with hemodynamic parameters as a part of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA). Materials and Methods A total of 60 patients undergoing hip surgeries were assigned to one of the two groups containing 30 patients each. Group I (the CSE-EVE group) patients were anesthetized using CSE with EVE and Group II (the CSE group) patients were anesthetized using CSE without EVE, using the same technique and low dose of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine. Sensory block characteristics were recorded using pinprick method, whereas motor blockade was assessed by modified Bromage scale. Results There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the level of maximum sensory block (P < 0.001), as Group I showed sensory block level extending to up to T4, whereas in Group II, it was limited to below T6. Time required for maximum sensory blockade was faster in Group I, ranging from 7 to 12 min (mean ± standard deviation [SD]: 9.83 ± 1.72), whereas in Group II, it ranged from 9 to 15 min (mean ± SD: 12.33 ± 1.83; P < 0.001). Two-segment regression was faster in Group II, ranging from 50 to 70 min (mean ± SD: 60.0 ± 6.30), whereas in Group I, it ranged from 80 to 105 min (mean ± SD: 89.67 ± 8.19; P < 0.001). The time required to reach the maximum motor block was faster in Group I, ranging from 2 to 4 min (mean ± SD: 2.67 ± 0.84), whereas in Group II, the time ranged from 2 to 6 min (mean ± SD: 3.50 ± 1.31; P < 0.001). Conclusion CSEA with EVE is associated with early onset of sensory and motor blockade, high level of sensory block, and longer time of two-segment regression while maintaining hemodynamic stability due to decreased dose of intrathecal local anesthetic.